FontShop Germany got a pretty distinguished panel of experts to pick the 100 'best' typefaces. It's an interesting list and more understandable if you read a little German: it should really be called the 100 most important typefaces. Aesthetic quality of the face only counts for 30% of the decision. A full 40% is for how well the typeface has sold and another 30% for its historical significance.
The top 10 are: Helvetica, Garamond, Frutiger, Bodoni, Futura, Times, Akzidenz Grotesk, Officina, Gill Sans, Univers. Some surprises there. Though I wouldn't choose Helvetica or Times very often for anything (much less their ugly pirate half-sisters, Times New Roman and Arial), I can understand their inclusion so near the top. But some of the others...? I mean, don't get me wrong, I love Officina -- enough to have bought it -- but on what criteria does it go so far ahead of its more expensive and extensive relative, Meta (on the list at 18)? And how does it rank ahead of Gill Sans on any of the three criteria?
There's a web site and also a PDF to download, but they're auf Deutsch and, oddly, they only show a letter or so from each typeface, so you're just as well looking them up in an online catalog.
This is the blog of Conrad Gempf, would-be writer and lecturer in New Testament at London School of Theology.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(50)
-
►
August
(8)
- Just wrote about this to a friend and on pressing ...
- Virtual reality has been an interest of mine for a...
- Hey, if you liked the lamp with the cord I mention...
- Jeremiah is a ferocious book. 23:23 Am I a God ne...
- My problem with Fred Peatross's new Missio Dei (Am...
- I got into a long conversation today with a non-Ch...
- Old blogging crony Fred Peatross has let me read h...
- The texts set for this coming Sunday, Col. 3:1-11 ...
-
►
July
(14)
- Do you top-post or bottom-post?
- I was going to stay up last night (whoops... night...
- I spent a significant part of the weekend explorin...
- The lectionary Gospel reading last week was the Ma...
- Apparently, Nathaniel Hawthorne once wrote: 'Happ...
- There are quite a few New Testament questions that...
- I started blogging because some of my former stude...
- WARNING: Nothing but spoilers coming. Watch the tr...
- My name is Theo Jansen. I'm a kinetic sculptor.
- Museumr. Upload your photo and voila.
- Someone wrote to me: Another theological question:...
- A friend of mine asked about the Dead Sea Scrolls ...
- Behold; the FlapFlap lamp from Büro für Form. W...
- I noted a wickedly clever quotation from Richard B...
-
►
February
(11)
- I'm pretty sure that having one of these would ch...
- Nice stuff to listen to while worrying at the cor...
- Antony sent me a reference the other day. It was a...
- What a find! Quite by accident, I stumbled across ...
- Exquisite timing from my perspective. Sudden snow ...
- Since 2004, gmail or google-mail, has been offerin...
- People seem to think that the reason that the iPod...
- I'm a frustrated and unhappy boy today, but that's...
- Derek Tidball led the Staff Prayer session this mo...
- Here's something my friend Brett will like: an art...
- If you're a BBC licence-payer, let me urge you to ...
-
▼
January
(12)
- Some web pages have words with double-underlining....
- Part of an on-going discussion with a colleague ab...
- FontShop Germany got a pretty distinguished panel ...
- Here's a few titles for books that no one would pu...
- The Gospel reading for the Sunday coming up is the...
- Yeah, we've all heard this before. New word proces...
- The popsci website explains. You'll need some glas...
- Fun weather! The TV report talked about 'damaging ...
- Okay, maybe I'm taking this too far, since it's al...
- Put enough water into a bowl of cornstarch ('cornf...
- Kat and Emma were playing with words the other day...
- Sorry about that. I got back from the States last ...
-
►
August
(8)