Okay, maybe I'm taking this too far, since it's all speculation about events beyond our understanding. But I'm so curious about what happened. See, here's a weird thing.
You know when Jesus does the thing with the miraculous catch of fish (Lk 5; Jn 21)? Did Jesus create a whole bunch of fish that hadn't existed before or did he cause a bunches of fish that were there to all be at the same place? I'll bet that like me, you gravitate toward the latter, right?
But here's the thing: when Jesus fed the multitudes (Mt 14, 15; Mk 6, 8) he was involved in creating stuff that wasn't there before. In this case, he would have been creating, or, to use the old term for this miracle, multiplying.
But what is that he's creating? It's, basically, a dead animal. But that strikes me as really weird: that Jesus created/multiplied dead animals. And if he created it without life, then can it be said to be dead? Or was it just material that was molecular identical to a dead fish? And did he only multiply the digestable bits, or did the basketfuls of scraps leftover include a heap of little bones as if there'd been that many fish instead of just five?
This blog is closed now. I've moved to http://gempf.com
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(50)
-
▼
January
(12)
- Some web pages have words with double-underlining....
- Part of an on-going discussion with a colleague ab...
- FontShop Germany got a pretty distinguished panel ...
- Here's a few titles for books that no one would pu...
- The Gospel reading for the Sunday coming up is the...
- Yeah, we've all heard this before. New word proces...
- The popsci website explains. You'll need some glas...
- Fun weather! The TV report talked about 'damaging ...
- Okay, maybe I'm taking this too far, since it's al...
- Put enough water into a bowl of cornstarch ('cornf...
- Kat and Emma were playing with words the other day...
- Sorry about that. I got back from the States last ...
-
▼
January
(12)