Okay, maybe I'm taking this too far, since it's all speculation about events beyond our understanding. But I'm so curious about what happened. See, here's a weird thing.
You know when Jesus does the thing with the miraculous catch of fish (Lk 5; Jn 21)? Did Jesus create a whole bunch of fish that hadn't existed before or did he cause a bunches of fish that were there to all be at the same place? I'll bet that like me, you gravitate toward the latter, right?
But here's the thing: when Jesus fed the multitudes (Mt 14, 15; Mk 6, 8) he was involved in creating stuff that wasn't there before. In this case, he would have been creating, or, to use the old term for this miracle, multiplying.
But what is that he's creating? It's, basically, a dead animal. But that strikes me as really weird: that Jesus created/multiplied dead animals. And if he created it without life, then can it be said to be dead? Or was it just material that was molecular identical to a dead fish? And did he only multiply the digestable bits, or did the basketfuls of scraps leftover include a heap of little bones as if there'd been that many fish instead of just five?
This is the blog of Conrad Gempf, would-be writer and lecturer in New Testament at London School of Theology.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(50)
-
►
August
(8)
- Just wrote about this to a friend and on pressing ...
- Virtual reality has been an interest of mine for a...
- Hey, if you liked the lamp with the cord I mention...
- Jeremiah is a ferocious book. 23:23 Am I a God ne...
- My problem with Fred Peatross's new Missio Dei (Am...
- I got into a long conversation today with a non-Ch...
- Old blogging crony Fred Peatross has let me read h...
- The texts set for this coming Sunday, Col. 3:1-11 ...
-
►
July
(14)
- Do you top-post or bottom-post?
- I was going to stay up last night (whoops... night...
- I spent a significant part of the weekend explorin...
- The lectionary Gospel reading last week was the Ma...
- Apparently, Nathaniel Hawthorne once wrote: 'Happ...
- There are quite a few New Testament questions that...
- I started blogging because some of my former stude...
- WARNING: Nothing but spoilers coming. Watch the tr...
- My name is Theo Jansen. I'm a kinetic sculptor.
- Museumr. Upload your photo and voila.
- Someone wrote to me: Another theological question:...
- A friend of mine asked about the Dead Sea Scrolls ...
- Behold; the FlapFlap lamp from Büro für Form. W...
- I noted a wickedly clever quotation from Richard B...
-
►
February
(11)
- I'm pretty sure that having one of these would ch...
- Nice stuff to listen to while worrying at the cor...
- Antony sent me a reference the other day. It was a...
- What a find! Quite by accident, I stumbled across ...
- Exquisite timing from my perspective. Sudden snow ...
- Since 2004, gmail or google-mail, has been offerin...
- People seem to think that the reason that the iPod...
- I'm a frustrated and unhappy boy today, but that's...
- Derek Tidball led the Staff Prayer session this mo...
- Here's something my friend Brett will like: an art...
- If you're a BBC licence-payer, let me urge you to ...
-
▼
January
(12)
- Some web pages have words with double-underlining....
- Part of an on-going discussion with a colleague ab...
- FontShop Germany got a pretty distinguished panel ...
- Here's a few titles for books that no one would pu...
- The Gospel reading for the Sunday coming up is the...
- Yeah, we've all heard this before. New word proces...
- The popsci website explains. You'll need some glas...
- Fun weather! The TV report talked about 'damaging ...
- Okay, maybe I'm taking this too far, since it's al...
- Put enough water into a bowl of cornstarch ('cornf...
- Kat and Emma were playing with words the other day...
- Sorry about that. I got back from the States last ...
-
►
August
(8)